Return home   Return to previous page


When
PANDORA’S BOX
Was on PBS






Sorry, but I have not studied this movie simply because I do not speak German. As far as I know, Pandora’s Box was severely censored and altered from its very first public performance, and had never been seen in anything even remotely resembling its original intentions until 44 years later. I could be wrong about that. As far as I know, it was in the early 1970’s that Jim Card found sufficient missing footage to piece together something fairly close to the original director’s cut. His reconstruction was 110 minutes at 24fps, about 20 minutes longer than the censored release editions. As far as I know, it was Janus Films that premièred Jim’s reconstruction, and that was in 1973. It seems, though, that Janus also had a print that ran a mere 89 minutes, and where on earth that came from, heaven only knows. Unless, of course, everybody was lying to me. Yes, I would love to study all the release editions from 1929 through 1972, but I have no clue where to find any of them. My understanding is that there are currently only three known sources, all of them dupes, each of them significantly shorter than the original, all taken from the German edition rather than the English export edition.


Now that I’ve worked out this much of the Metropolis mystery, it finally occurs to me why the “PBS Movie Theater” edition of Pandora’s Box was so different from any other version. Easy. It was an early reconstruction. Earlier and later reconstructions were issued, but that one on PBS seemed to be an in-between. The 16mm Janus prints had music tracks, but PBS insisted on 35mm, and the 35mm Janus prints of that movie were full-aperture Silent. (How do I know? I ran one, on Tuesday, 4 September 2001, in Buffalo at the Market Arcade downtown. The cinema didn’t have speed controls, unfortunately. I don’t know how Pabst wanted his movie shown, but to my subjective eyes it looks perfect at 21fps and awful at 24fps. It was so irritating not to be able to make that adjustment. I brought along my own lens and silent aperture, which threw the image wayyyyyyy off to the left. I went out to my car to get my jack to lift the back of the machine and swivel it over. Jonathan Benjamin accompanied on electric piano, but I couldn’t hear a single note from up in the booth. Everybody told me that he did a really good job, though. Then, when the movie was over, I had to crank up my car jack again and swivel the machine back. Anyway, that’s how I know that the Janus 35mm prints were full-aperture silent.)


PBS had worked with William P. Perry in years past, and so hired him to write a score for that film. Since there was no soundtrack to lock down the speed, PBS told its techies to slow it down to 20fps, which is almost exactly right for that particular movie. It looks just fine at 20fps. No complaints. Bill composed the most hypnotic, haunting, lovely piano score I have ever heard in my life, and for decades now I have been humming the “Lulu” theme tune to myself. Calmative. For nearly eight years, I searched high and low for that particular edition of the movie, but could never find it. I spoke with the folks at Janus, who insisted that the film was 89 minutes, or 110 minutes, that it was never 132 minutes. I spoke with the folks at PBS, who insisted that the program was 110 minutes and not a minute longer, period, end of story. The people on the other end of the phone line insisted, INSISTED, that my memory was at fault. That version of the movie was broadcast only once, and then the master quads were deposited at Bill’s company, the Great Amwell Corporation (271 Madison Ave, Manhattan NY 10016), where they soon began to rot, as quads are wont to do. In 1985, I was finally able to trace the rights owners, and I spoke at length with a fellow at Great Amwell, who INSISTED that the containers for the three-reel quad explicitly stated that the program was 110 minutes, which would hardly make any sense, because 110 minutes would be on two reels, not three. “But it has Bill Perry’s score?” “Yes.” “And it was the tape broadcast on PBS in December 1977?” “Yes.” “Then it’s 132 minutes.” Nope, he said. We cut a verbal deal: I would put a $200 check in the mail and they would put a VHS in the mail, and the two would cross. He ran off two VHS copies, a single T-120 at long play, and a pair of T-120’s at standard play. Which did I want? I would have preferred a single T-160 at standard play, but Drew was not familiar with such a product. Okay, I chose the single T-120 at long play. They got $200 and I got euphoria. He included a letter with the tape, apologizing for the occasional dropouts, and responded that, “Yes, it’s 133 minutes.”


Fifteen years later, a gal named Diedre Conn, who had just started at the office where I worked, got to chatting. To my utter astonishment, she spoke of silent movies. Her two favorites were Lon Chaney and Louise Brooks. You could have knocked me over with a feather. I told her, “I’ve got something I know you’ve never seen.” So, I loaned that VHS to her, but she was on her way to visit her family in Kentucky, I think for the Thanksgiving holiday, and she promised to talk with me about it upon her return. While in Kentucky, she suffered an aneurysm. What a way to lose a friend. So I’ll never see that tape again. Who knows what on earth ever happened to it.


When a Killiam Shows employee and I chatted by phone again shortly after Diedre went comatose, I groaned that I would never see my tape of Pandora’s Box again. He was a bit stunned. Killiam had a professional copy! Exactly what I had described! He instantly figured out that my $200 had funded the transfer that was on file at his office. So he ran off another VHS for me, T-160 at standard play. So, by something resembling a miracle, I had it in my hands again, almost right away! It actually looked better than the one I had received directly from Great Amwell. There was a moment near the beginning, when Lulu calls out “Schigolch!” that had bounced around on my long-play tape, since the control track was missing for a few frames. On this new standard-play tape, though, it sailed right along, never mind a few missing control pulses. The biggest difference was that the first tape opened with a caption that was spoken by a narrator: “THIS PROGRAM HAS BEEN MADE POSSIBLE IN PART BY A GRANT FROM THE EXXON CORPORATION.” The replacement tape deleted that announcement. About 15 years ago, I burned it to a DVD-R, and I just now decided to pull an excerpt from it and plop it onto this web page, but lo and behold, the DVD-R has rotted. Darn! That settles it: DVD-R is only for short-term manipulation, nothing more. Do not consign your memories to DVD-R. VHS still plays 45 years later, but DVD-R doesn’t even make it to the 10-year mark. My VHS is now in storage, and I simply must retrieve it as soon as I get back to Albuquerque. This time, I’ll burn it to DVD-R again and then immediately port it over to digital. And then I’ll post a nice excerpt on this web page.


UPDATE, MONDAY, 2 DECEMBER 2024: I just got back to Albuquerque and retrieved the tape. Hoorah. I see more than ever before that the film source for this tape had errors. Three credits were misspelled, the eight act numbers were deleted, and one title was grossly mistranslated: “Mäzen” means “patron” or more properly, in this context, it means “sugar daddy.” Judging from what we can see, Lulu is understating the case, as Schigolch was clearly her pimp. Yet the word is inexplicably rendered as “friend” in this print. Further, at least nineteen titles were missing altogether. I made what corrections I could by adding captions at the bottom of the screen. There are some video glitches, too, as blue speckles suddenly pop up over the images. There is also a segment, beginning at 0:10:29 and lasting about 19 seconds, in which the quad’s control track got corrupted and so the image breaks up and blacks out altogether and the music slows down and speeds up repeatedly as the machine was trying to lock to the pulses again. Then at 0:14:03 the music goes out for four seconds. Nothing I can do about that. Sorry. The bungled change-over from the second video reel to the third at 1:57:54 was exactly like that when PBS beamed the movie out to the various educational stations that had licensed it. Bungled change-overs were oh so common back in those days. Nobody noticed and so nobody cared. As you can see, NTSC in 1977 was no match for hi-def in 2024. Technology has made great strides. Anyway, here it is.




https://youtu.be/TnLTRXgXQi8


It is so easy to spot the change-over from quad reel 2 to quad reel 3, and video change-overs in those days were probably never perfect. Every change-over had a tell-tale clue. So why could I never find the change-over from quad reel 1 to quad reel 2? From 1985 until just this moment, I could never spot it. Now I am ashamed. Here it is, at 1:00:16:




By the way, in case you’re curious, the 16mm print from 1974, 110 minutes at 24fps, had a few editing and translation corrections, and it had a piano score by Curtis Ivan Salke. The VHS edition from Embassy Home Entertainment in 1988 had a piano score by Stuart Oderman. Neither was a thousandth as good as Bill Perry’s score. For what it’s worth, Salke’s score has never been issued on video. The only way to hear it is to get that 16mm print, if it still exists.



Criterion DVD, 2006

Eureka Blu-ray, 2023

Criterion Blu-ray, 2024

Criterion DVD, 2024


If you’re looking for an image of better quality, you can get the Criterion 358 DVD from 2006. The Eureka “Masters of Cinema” # 280 EKA70505 Blu-ray from 2023 should have been good, but the digital scrubbing was too aggressive, and so the important image of the coins dropping out of the meter reader’s hand is gone. Much better is the Criterion 358 Blu-ray from 2024, which uses exactly the same restoration that Eureka used, but not exactly. The master file created by Martin Koerber’s team for the Deutsche Kinemathek inevitably had as the lowest layer the raw scan. The Criterion crew went right back to that raw scan, pulled up more detail, were careful not to be fooled by the automatic dirt removal, and then rendered the result at 19fps rather than the 20fps that the Deutsche Kinemathek preferred. The Criterion Blu-ray is, visually, the best of all the home-video editions. Do not get the Criterion 358 DVD from 2024, though, as it looks quite awful, too contrasty, with darks that are far too black and lights are far too white. The two Criterion issues from 2024 are both from the same master, and why they look so drastically different I do not understand.


The other scores on video don’t do much for me. Two of the four scores on the Criterion DVD are passable but nothing more. The other two, well.... I purchased the Tartan Video VHS, issued in the UK in 1993, 25fps, just so that I could check out the musical score. Well, there isn’t one. It is completely mute, but the liner notes suggest that we put on some Tangerine Dream while watching the movie. Or The Orb. Or Bernard Herrmann. Thanks guys. Very helpful. Not. And it’s from a dark, dupey, flickery print with gobs of jitter and weave, probably a 16mm bootleg. Worthy of nothing more than the garbage bin. I once heard an accompaniment to Pandora’s Box by a trio — piano, violin, French horn (the program notes say piano, guitar, and trumpet, and so my memory must be at fault) — playing the same several seconds of agonizingly discordant noise over and over and over and over and over and over again, for two and a half hours. The trumpet sounded like a whale moaning in agony as it was being tortured to death by the other two instruments, which ceaselessly took turns picking through its flesh with a chisel. They totally killed the movie. And I wanted to kill the musicians. Most of the audience politely stood and applauded when the abomination was over, and that was one of the most offensive spectacles I have ever witnessed. It would have been better had there been no accompaniment at all. Had I not been there as part of a group of four who drove me there and back, I would have walked out. As for the other three in our group, they had never seen the movie before and they absolutely despised it. Two of them soon fell asleep out of oppressive boredom. That awful racket killed the film, killed it dead. That horrid endless-loop wailing transformed a captivating, beautiful movie into an ugly endurance test. As that repetitious cacophony continued, I wanted to scream out, “SHUT OFF THAT NOISE ALREADY!!!!! SHUT UP!!!!! STOP IT!!!!!” That is when I decided never again to attend a silent film unless I am assured that the accompaniment will be by musicians who have been trained in silent cinema and who know what they’re doing and who are not using the opportunity to show off. I am so lucky, so so so so so so lucky, that my introduction to Pandora’s Box was via Bill Perry, not via that trio. I grieve for all the people who were introduced to the movie through that trio.


By the time high-intensity carbon-arc lamphouses were installed in the deluxe cinemas in 1920–1923, three-wing shutters were junked and replaced with two-wing shutters, and when you mix two-wing disc shutters (or barrel shutters) and high intensity in the same recipe, the strobe is intolerable at speeds less than about 80'/min., or less than about 21fps. To run films at slower speeds, the image needs to be dimmed either with a filter or with a three-wing shutter, but such dimming killed the whole point of the high intensity that the cinema owners had just spent a fortune installing, and so dimming was not permitted. So there’s the bottom limit: Any studio film made for showings at cinemas from 1922 onwards needed to be run at speeds no slower than about 80'/min., no slower than about 21fps. Simple. Definitive. Inarguable. But unknown. That is knowledge that has been completely lost nowadays. Why has it been lost? Because there was no historical continuity. As soon as studios made the business decision to have sync tracks on all their films filled with wall-to-wall drivel, nobody nobody nobody nobody nobody felt it worthwhile to document how things had been done previously. You can still find the vintage technical manuals in libraries, but most of them were badly written, confusing, and inaccurate. Technicians seldom good writers make. F.H. Richardson, for instance, wrote at length about the necessity of obtaining natural motion on screen, and yet we can see, when we examine those films, natural speed was impossible since they were severely undercranked. When he ran films in speeded motion, he often thought he was running them in natural motion. He was right to object to other operators turning the speed up more than he did, but he literally misinterpreted motion. We all misinterpret it. When modern scholars rely upon these old publications, they come away with endless wrong ideas. I do not exempt myself. I spent years and years and years delving into the vintage publications, and I came away from those studies with conclusions that were almost entirely erroneous. So here we go. Here’s a video that makes my heart sink:



https://youtu.be/I_lqtFtB63s
Click on the above image to watch the video.
When YouTube disappears this video, download it.


The above was shown at the Borderlines Film Festival on Sunday, 7 March 2015, 6:15pm, at The Courtyard in Hereford. As projectionist Simon Nicholls confesses in the note beneath the YouTube video, he ran it with the Academy 1:1.375 aperture (.600"×.825") rather than the full 1:1.33 silent aperture (.6796"×.90625"). Why? I’ll tell you why. Because his owners did not deem it worth the bother to purchase the correct aperture or the appropriate longer lens to accommodate. That’s why. To compensate somewhat, he inserted the aperture only part way in order to have a crop that was centered. Actually, it is amazing that a modern cinema had even the 1:1.375 setup. That was exceedingly rare, and nearly every cinema on earth would have cropped the image much, much, much more than that. Look at the booth setup! A single machine with all six reels spliced together onto a gigantic outboard reel, and the film had to go through torturous winding paths. Bad in every way. Now that film prints are rare, they should all be treated as archival. Chopping off leaders and tails to splice all the reels onto larger reels should be verboten. Such assemblies damage the film. The winding path doesn’t faze projectionists, except for this particular one. Triacetate and diacetate films are all brittle and getting brittler. A winding path, as I have personally experienced, can rip a brittle film to shreds. There is more. The machine was slowed down to 20fps, or 75'/min. Pandora’s Box can be slowed down that much, and it looks fine that way, but it was never shown that way originally and 21fps would be more authentic. As Simon further confesses: “Trial and error dictated 20fps was about right for the pianist without too much flicker.” Yikes! If you’re gonna slow it down to 20fps, you need to install three-wing shutters or, better yet, just drop a filter in front of the lens to darken the image slightly. That eliminates objectionable strobe (it’s strobe, not flicker), and no matter which method is used the result looks identical, as far as the human eye can discern. Instead, he just ran it with the normal setup but slowed down, resulting in more strobe, though, he says, not “too much.” Ach, Mein Gott in Himmel! Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. This is how things are done at a festival????? Festival presentations are supposed to be flawless. There should be no compromises whatsoever. What has the world come to? Why do I almost never go to movies anymore? This is why. Except in the rarest venues, rare venues that are getting rarer by the month, the presentations are all ruined. I would rather not see a movie at all than see it massacred.


Once again, I am going to be tiresome, even though I have discovered that NOBODY cares a fig about this atrocity:



Silent

Cropped to Academy sound format

Cropped to widescreen

Silent

Cropped to Academy sound format

Cropped to widescreen

Silent

Cropped to Academy sound format

Cropped to widescreen

Silent

Cropped to Academy sound format

Cropped to widescreen

Silent

Cropped to Academy sound format

Cropped to widescreen

Silent

Cropped to Academy sound format

Cropped to widescreen

Silent

Cropped to Academy sound format

Cropped to widescreen

Nobody cares. Nobody. Nobody. Except for me. I am the only one who cares. And nobody understands why I care. People get fed up with me for griping about this. When people ask why I didn’t attend a silent movie I really wanted to see, I tell them that this is the reason, and they sigh in exasperation and walk away, done with me forever. “Picky, picky, picky.”


Ah! Click here for an article that tells us what sources still survive on this film. Nothing original survives. Only three much-later copies have been passed on to us. That confuses me completely.


Below is what little I have been able to dig up about the distribution/exhibition history. Just after I did the bulk of this research, I discovered that I am not the first person to plough into this. Thomas Gladysz beat me to the punch by a full five years, and then he beat me to the punch again by a month and a half!


Moviegraphs, Inc.
154 West 55th Street
Manhattan NY


According to IMDb, the US distributor in 1929 was Moviegraphs, a very small firm that seems to have lasted only a few years. We learn more from Mordaunt Hall in the New York Times of 21 May 1927:


THE SCREEN
The first motion picture theatre built specially for the furtherance of the intelligent motion pictures was opened last night. It seats 260 persons and is called the Fifty-fifth Street Cinema, and is in Fifty-fifth Street just east of Seventh Avenue. In other days the structure was the scene of livery and horses. It is tastefully decorated. The Art Cinema League, as it is called, sponsors this new place of entertainment. The guiding spirits are M. M. Maiman, H. D. Dubiner and Robert I. Powell. Mr. Maiman has been connected with the motion picture business as the head of Moviegraphs, Inc. Mr. Dubiner is a wholesale diamond dealer in this city and Mr. Powell is an architect.
The features of the new strutcure that attract the eye are the fine oak ceiling and the artistic proscenium arch. It is set forth on the program that this new picture theatre will “be devoted to the intellect and the esthetic emotions, rather than the cheap sentimentalities and banal melodramatics.”...
Samuel Kramer, violinist.


Was M.M. Maiman the same as Max Milton Maiman, born in NYC on 12 July 1897? Was he the same as Max Maiman, died in NYC on 11 October 1951? Note the name of H.D. Dubiner(!!!!!). Dubiner was one of those Ellis Island transmogrifications. The name was originally Dubinski. This might prove an invaluable lead! Oh my oh my oh my, I need to learn more about this! More info comes from Tony Guzman, “The Little Theatre Movement: The Institutionalization of the European Art Film in America,” Film History: An International Journal, vol. 17 nos. 2/3 (2005), pp. 261–284, published by Taylor & Francis. Shall we examine the relevant portions of the text?


On 20 May 1927 another full-time art theatre opened on West 55th Street near Seventh Avenue. The 55th Street Cinema was a former stable that was transformed into a theatre. It seated 260 people with ticket prices of $.50 and $.75, similar to the Cameo and cheaper than the Fifth Avenue Playhouse. It was probably the first American film theatre built specifically as an art theatre, since the other American art theatres were either ordinary commercial film theatres or converted little theatres of the stage. The 55th Street Cinema was sponsored by the Art Cinema League under the direction of M.M. Maiman, the director of Moviegraphs, Inc., a small distribution company that would emerge as a notable distributor of foreign films in 1929. His associates were H.D. Dubiner, a wholesale diamond dealer, and Robert I. Powell, an architect. Earlier in the year the League had sponsored a midnight repertory program at a second run theatre, the Plaza on Madison Avenue at 59th Street, where they had shown The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari on 9 April 1927....
The Art Cinema League brought in Symon Gould from the Film Arts Guild to take over programming in an effort to compete better with its two stronger rivals, but the 55th Street Cinema continued to struggle for films and patrons.
By 3 October 1927, after months of poor to mediocre business, the self-proclaimed ‘Sanctuary of the Cinema’ fired much of its staff and replaced Gould with Jay David Blaufox who, contrary to the statement of purpose delivered in May, inaugurated a policy of showing any ‘great’ film regardless of whether it was ‘art’ or not.
At the beginning of 1928 Michael Mindlin’s Fifth Avenue Playhouse Group, Inc., was the dominant figure in the little theatre movement.... Mindlin reached the pinnacle of his success in January 1928 when he finally succeeded in vanquishing the 55th Street Cinema. In little more than seven months the 55th Street Cinema had lost $84,000 with the result that the theatre owners closed the theatre, fired Jay David Blaufox and his staff, and brought in Mindlin to run it. Mindlin changed the theatre's name to the 55th Street Playhouse and reopened the theatre on 17 February 1928 with the national premiere of Der Kampf des Donald Westhof (The Trial of Donald Westhof, 1927). Mindlin's management team quickly turned around the 55th Street Playhouse’s profitability with their ability to book better films and superior showmanship. The Fifth Avenue Playhouse Group now enjoyed near total dominance of New York’s art film market.
Mindlin’s good fortune ended that summer as he suffered a series of reversals that reduced his empire abruptly to a single theatre....
In New York his expansion plans cost him the 55th Street Playhouse. In August, Mindlin took out a lease on a former night club, ‘Le Perroquet’, on 146 West 57th Street in the same general area as the 55th Street Playhouse. On this site Mindlin began to create the Little Carnegie Playhouse, the most luxurious and modern little theatre in the country. Mindlin secured the property by agreeing to a rental of $21,000 per year as well as sharing 25 per cent of the net profits with the property owner, Otto H. Kahn. Not surprisingly the owners of the 55th Street Playhouse took a very dim view of the conflict of interest in Mindlin building an opposition theatre in the same district as the theatre he was managing for them. They fired Mindlin in September 1928 and hired away his valuable aide, Joe Fliesler, to manage the 55th Street Playhouse....
Mindlin’s former employee Joseph Fliesler had in the meantime succeeded in completely reversing the 55th Street Playhouse’s fortunes. The Playhouse had been a financial disaster prior to its acquisition by Mindlin in early 1928. Under Mindlin’s direction for most of the 1928, the Playhouse’s business improved somewhat, losing only $25,000 for the year. However under Fliesler’s first full year of directorship, the Playhouse actually turned a profit of $5,000 in 1929. It was a remarkable turnaround for a theatre that had seemed destined for failure....


Moviegraphs, Inc., must have ordered several prints from Nero Films A.G. in Berlin. As each print was submitted to a local censor board prior to each booking, the local censor board ordered massive cuts. I can find only six bookings, three of them in NYC. So there were likely four prints at minimum, likely five. I can only assume that Moviegraphs kept at least one uncut print for reference. Or could it have been that Moviegraphs did not order prints, but instead ordered a lavender or a copy negative, from which it could make as many prints as it needed? What happened to all these prints? Were they all returned to Berlin? Or were they chemically dissolved when the license expired?


Thomas Gladysz wrote a wonderful article on the topic, in which he provided a bit of information about the various international releases. See it at “‘Sin Lust Evil’ in America: Louise Brooks and the Exhibition History of Pandora’s Box (1929),” filmint Online: Thinking Film Since 1973, 23 April 2023.


Probably never played in Australia, though we see that it did get a bit of publicity in anticipation of a release:




Apparently, there was a Manhattan press screening for critics only, and it almost certainly occurred right at the end of October 1929 at the 55th Street Playhouse. To all appearances, this was a complete print as received from Nero Films A.G. What appeared on screen once the local censors ran it through their lawnmower was only about two-thirds the original length, about 80 minutes, though at what speed, we do not know. I need to know the footage lengths to know more about what happened. The practice was that the deleted portions of the print would remain with the censor board to prevent their reinsertion.




The scheduled opening day:




The advertised closing day:




Actually, I am quite certain that it did not play at all. It was scheduled and advertised, but the censor board killed it. Perhaps the 55th Street Playhouse went dark these two days?


Why was Pandora’s Box censored? There is not a single objectionable image in it. There is not a single objectionable word in it. Vajda and Pabst kept it all as inoffensive as possible. The problem was with the story and the characters: a hooker, a pimp, two-timing, a son falling in love with his dad’s mistress who in turn has her own girlfriend. There is murder, white slavery, and a sullen loner who cannot restrain himself from murdering women. All of these individual elements had appeared earlier in mainstream films that aroused nobody’s ire. I suppose that Pandora’s Box outraged the censors simply because it lumped all these elements together. Maybe. Whatever. I suppose that the censors eliminated the characters and the plot, and if they wanted to do that, then why did they not just ban the film altogether? That would have been a better decision. The best decision would simply have been to pass the film unaltered. Nobody would have been corrupted by it and nobody of any consequence would have objected, either.



Image stolen from Wikipedia.





Ran 14 days, Saturday, 30 November 1929,
through Friday, 13 December 1929.






Every copy of this movie that I have ever seen misspells Alice Roberte as Alice Roberts. I see this problem goes back to December 1929! Please pay attention to the German poster above. This is what you see:




Also, the French poster:



Image stolen from Wikipedia.


You still disbelieve me, so here’s an autographed photo as listed by Wittenborn Art Books of San Francisco:




And from Cyranos.ch:




So there.





Alice Roberte was most definitely not Wedekind’s widow.



It ran one week, from Sunday, 26 January 1930, through Saturday, 1 February 1930.



So the marriage was omitted? That’s a pretty darned crucial plot element.


The NYC print had been censored, but the print sent to Baltimore was seemingly authentic, probably maybe. The reviewer writes that in the preview edition, the Countess murdered Quast. No she did not!!!! Either he misremembered, misperceived, or misspoke, or he saw a print that had already been altered. This furthers our certitude that Moviegraphs had ordered several prints. After a private screening, the Maryland censors hacked away at it. The censors deleted the murder of Quast????? They deleted the ending????? Sorta kills the whole point to the story, doesn’t it?



Ran for one week, Saturday, 10 May 1930, through Friday, 16 May 1930.






Pandora’s Box also received probably a single British booking, at a small cinema that did not advertise, and so we cannot ascertain precisely when the movie was shown. We are also in the dark about which company distributed it.






Thomas Gladysz includes the above ad in his essay, surely from 15 May 1931 and surely from somewhere in New Jersey, but I have searched high and low for it and can find it nowhere, not in ProQuest, not in Newspapers.com, not in NewspaperArchive.com, not in GenealogyBank.com, not in Google Newspapers, not in Chronicling America, not in Google Books, not in Archive.org, not in Old Fulton Postcards. I cannot figure out how he found this, unless, perchance, he did it the old-fashioned way: a library. What I find odd here is the unique announcement that this presentation of Pandora’s Box is “Synchronized with Thrilling Sound Effects,” which, of course, it was not. Utterly preposterous claim. That was a mistake, a fragment of a different ad that got inserted by accident. The management of the Little caught it right away and corrected it for the next day’s paper.


Or was it a preposterous claim? A critic whose initials were “R.H.” wrote in “The Week on the Screen: Three Silent Films,” The Guardian, Saturday, 19 April 1930, p. 8: “I had no idea when I wrote last week of Pabst’s ‘Lulu,’ that it would be trade shown so soon. It was rumoured that it was being synchronized, but it was shown silent last week under its original title of ‘Pandora’s Box’....” Okay. Whatever. This R.H. also wrongly supplied Alice’s surname as Roberts. Here are R.H.’s two reviews dealing with Lulu, or Pandora’s Box:






We can discern from what R.H. wrote that he (almost certainly a he) had previously seen a more authentic edition, surely in Germany. I have no idea who the British distributor was, though I can only assume that Nero sent the British distributor the now-lost export edition. The export edition, of course, would have had the “NOTICE To the Women of London” in English, as we can see from a unit still that was included in the published script:









The 5th Avenue Theatre advertised only sporadically,
for the simple reason that it was open only sporadically.
The movie played three days.








Zo, let us summarize. The only English-language bookings that I can find are:


ca. Thu 31 Oct 1929 55th Street Playhouse (press screening) Manhattan NY
Sat 02 Nov 1929 – Sun 03 Nov 1929 55th Street Playhouse (CANCELED) Manhattan NY
Sat 30 Nov 1929 – Fri 13 Dec 1929 55th Street Playhouse Manhattan NY
Wed 01 Jan 1930 Little (press screening) Baltimore MD
Sun 26 Jan 1930 – Sat 01 Feb 1930 Little Baltimore MD
ca. 14 Apr 1930 [unknown] (trade screening) London, England
Sat 10 May 1930 – Fri 16 May 1930 Acme Manhattan NY
ca. 24 Aug 1930 Gaiety Picture Palace London, England
Sat 16 May 1931 – Fri 22 May 1931? Little Newark NJ
Tue 05 Dec 1933 – Thu 07 Dec 1933 Fifth Avenue Theatre Manhattan NY
Sun 29 Apr 1934 (only) The Playhouse at Taliesin Madison WI


That was it. The movie was a boxoffice dud. Nobody knew about it, and nobody cared. It was as dead as a doornail. It disappeared, unknown, entirely forgotten. When that happens to a movie, it remains forgotten forever. In this case, though, it was forgotten only for 26 years. Then a miracle happened, and, almost overnight, it became one of the most famous movies in all cinema history.


It must have been in 1955 that Henri Langlois revived Pandora’s Box at the Cinémathèque française in Paris. Why did he do that? Alas, here I need to rely upon my extremely faulty memory about a story that Jim Card told. My memory is that Jim repeatedly begged Henri for a screening of Diary of a Lost Girl, which he had never seen and which was in the Cinémathèque’s collection. Henri scoffed at the idea, proclaiming that the film could not possibly be of any interest whatsoever. Yet at last he gave in to Jim’s entreaties and the two watched it together. The film was incomplete and ended abruptly when Fritz Rasp got his face slapped, which meant it was missing about the last three reels. Langlois, initially hostile to the film, was bowled over and proclaimed that Louise was the best actress ever. He then retrieved Pandora’s Box and projected that as well. That must have been when Jim first saw either film, as neither had been available anywhere.


Langlois, maddeningly, insisted that silent films all be shown at exactly 16fps without any musical accompaniment. Brutal torture! It would be unendurable at 16fps. In a just world, showing a silent film to a paying audience without providing appropriate musical accompaniment would be a capital offense.


Just afterwards, Jim Card of the Eastman House learned Louise’s whereabouts and convinced her to move to Rochester and write a memoir.


Much of this article was nearly illegible, and so I retyped it. “Errol Flynn” should have been “Leon Errol.” The mistake was in the original. Near the beginning, I corrected “several weks” to “several weeks.”


In 1957 Jim Card revived three of Louise’s movies at the Dryden screening room at the Eastman House in Rochester: Love ’Em and Leave ’Em, Diary of a Lost Girl, and Prix de beauté. Apparently there is a widespread belief that Pandora’s Box was shown as well, in June 1958, but I have gone through the newspaper listings for all of 1958 and cannot find it. The Eastman House presented one movie each weekend, once on Saturday, repeated on Sunday. I do not see Pandora’s Box listed anywhere. I do, though, find a listing for Diary of a Lost Girl on Saturday/Sunday, 21/22 June 1958. Shall we look a bit more closely?


Sat, 03 May 1958, “free movies” [no title mentioned]
Sun, 04 May 1958, “movies” [no title mentioned]
Sat, 10 May 1958, “free movies” [probably The Brothers Karamazov]
Sat, 11 May 1958, The Brothers Karamazov
Sat, 17 May 1958, “free movies” [no title mentioned]
Sun, 18 May 1958, “films” [no title mentioned]
Sat, 24 May 1958, The Outcasts a/k/a Slums of Berlin
Sun, 25 May 1958, The Outcasts a/k/a Slums of Berlin
Sat, 31 May 1958, Sparrows
Sun, 01 Jun 1958, Sparrows
Sat, 07 Jun 1958, Port of Shadows
Sun, 08 Jun 1958, Port of Shadows
Sat, 14 Jun 1958, Tess of the Storm Country
Sun, 15 Jun 1958, Tess of the Storm Country
Sat, 21 Jun 1958, Diary of a Lost Girl
Sun, 22 Jun 1958, Diary of a Lost Girl
Sat, 28 Jun 1958, free movies (title not listed, but probably Vampyr)
Sun, 29 Jun 1958, Vampyr
Sat, 05 Jul 1958, Twentieth Century
Sun, 06 Jun 1958, Twentieth Century
Sat, 12 Jul 1958, The Yellow Cruise, film of the Asiatic expedition
Sun, 13 Jun 1958, The Yellow Cruise
Sat, 19 Jul 1958, Things to Come
Sun, 20 Jun 1958, Things to Come
Sat, 26 Jul 1958, The Wedding of Palo
Sun, 27 Jun 1958, The Wedding of Palo






Then, inexplicably, the movie began popping up again. The BFI somehow got some sort of print of some edition of it from somewhere and presented it at the National Film Theatre in London in May 1957. The published shooting script, in English translation, appeared from Lorrimer (London) and Simon & Schuster (NY) in 1971. “Square brackets and footnotes denote the parts of the script that did not appear in the print of the film available for viewing.” What print of the film was available for viewing? The BFI’s print. What else can we learn about the BFI print? Nothing until the BFI’s website begins to function again. Oh, wait, miracle. It opened:




Insufficient information, but we can learn a little. At the bottom we see catalogue number C-25553, an 8,043' duplicating positive from 1962, which is 89 minutes at 24fps. Hmmmmm. That sounds an awful lot like Janus’s claim in the 1970’s. Only one of the above items is 16mm, C-122803, but we know nothing about it. Was this the print that was shown around England in the 1960’s? Was this the print that the BFI presented at the National Film Theatre prior to 1966?


Can’t remember where, but, many moons ago, I read an interview with Louise in which she insisted that the original film could only have been about 89 or 90 minutes long; she further rejected any claims that it was ever any longer than about 90 minutes. She was wrong. Current prints are 110 minutes (at 24fps, longer if slowed down, as they often are), and so that’s about 9,900 feet. The original release records indicate that it was 3,254m, which is about 10,676 feet, which is about 8 minutes longer (at 24fps) than the version we have now.




Stranger yet, the movie played at UCLÁ’s Royce Hall in June 1962. Where did the print come from? What edition was it?






Apparently, the Cinémathèque française and the BFI continued to revive Pandora’s Box with some regularity. As the Marylebone and Paddington Mercury of Friday, 27 November 1964 (p. 6) asserted: “Whenever the film has been revived at the National Film Theatre and in Paris, it has drawn capacity houses. Louise Brooks emerged from retirement to find herself a legend.” (See also this.)




There is no listing that I can find anywhere, but the article below confirms that Pandora’s Box was indeed presented at the Eastman House’s Dryden screening room on Monday, 12 July 1965, with Louise herself as guest of honor. Of course, Jim, as always, insisted on running all silent films at 24fps, because that’s how he remembered movies being presented when he was a kid in the 1920’s. He didn’t seem to understand that, prior to 1922, 24fps was way too fast for most movies. He also seemed not to understand that many foreign films did not follow Hollywood practice, and so they need to be slowed down a bit. Yes, I had this conversation with him, and it got, well, complicated. Not heated, but complicated. In my opinion, Pandora’s Box looks horrible at 24fps. It looks great at 21fps. In my opinion. How I wish I knew Pabst’s preference! (After Jim retired, the Dryden finally installed variable speed in, I think, 1991, but made a total mess of it. A decade or so later they finally worked out the bugs.) This 12 July 1965 screening is the one that Louise mentioned in her September 1965 article, “Pabst and Lulu,” originally published in Sight and Sound and later reprinted in the brochure that accompanied the 2006 Criterion DVD set as well as in the 2024 Criterion Blu-ray (thought not the 2024 Criterion DVD).




By 1967, the BFI must have been loaning out a print, likely 16mm, for we discover that the Bristol Arts Centre presented the film in June 1967.


A year later, we discover that the Cinémathèque canadienne in Montréal presented the film on Friday, 4 October 1968. Where did this come from? Was it a 16mm print from the BFI’s distribution library?


It then popped up again, at a members-only cinema, the Tyneside Cinema Two, on Sunday, 30 November 1969: Presumably this was a BFI 16mm circulating print:




And at the Newport Film Theatre in Newport, Gwent, Wales, on Wednesday, 1 April 1970:



Was this the BFI 16mm circulating print (assuming there was one)?
Who was the accompanist?


It was sometime in 1971 that Lorrimer in London and Simon & Schuster in New York issued a heavily copy-edited English translation of the shooting script, with some annotations about the differences between the script and the BFI print that the editors were able to examine. Many of the differences were the result of adjustments made during filming. Others were the result of alterations and deletions. Many of those alterations and deletions were made by censors. I suspect that some were made by Pabst himself, shortly after the première. So it is clear that somebody thought there was a market for this. I remember in about 1975, chancing upon this at Plaza Books at the Coronado Shopping Center in Albuquerque. I had never heard of the movie before, but it looked intriguing. I picked it up, read a little at the beginning, and looked at the pictures. The $2.95 cover price was more than thirty times my net wealth, and so I reluctantly placed it back onto the display table:




The Pacific Film Archive in Berkeley, on Thursday, 5 October 1972:



This must have been a MoMA print, yes?


Then there was this promising series from the MoMA library, promised for the War Memorial Center at the Milwaukee Art Center, but I don’t think it ever happened, as one by one each film was canceled. Pandora’s Box was scheduled for Thursday, 26 October 1972, but it went phffft.






















Janus Films somehow licensed the rights seemingly in the early 1970’s, and that may or may not have been from the BFI, as it was allegedly 89 minutes. Information is scarce. Or maybe that never happened? In 1973, Janus licensed the rights to a preliminary reconstruction, on which Jim Card must have served as a consultant. How do I know? Because Jim praised Pabst’s brilliance at never inserting titles in the middle of shots. Of course, Jim was wrong, as Pabst most certainly did insert titles in mid-shot. (Yes, I had that conversation with him, too, sometime in the early 1990’s. He did not argue the point, and so I took that as a concession.) This 1973 reconstruction is obviously missing titles that were once inserted mid-shot. It could only have been Jim who ordered those titles deleted as spurious.


Whatever version or versions of Pandora’s Box Janus offered, the movie was being shown, somewhere, here and there, and so members of film clubs as well as university students got to see it, and it was also booked here and there at museums and at commercial cinemas. So a few Americans were discovering it. Very few.


These revivals led to other revivals. Those revivals also got people to talking about a movie that absolutely NOBODY would otherwise have known about.


Walker Art Center auditorium, Minnapolis, 11 June 1974:






Edmonton Art Gallery Cinema, Thursday, 11 December 1975:



Where did this print come from? Was it 16mm?




MoMA, Sunday, 7 November 1976:



16mm or 35mm? MoMA or Janus?




El Rey, San Francisco, Tuesday, 29 March 1977:



16mm or 35mm? MoMA or Janus?




OISE Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Thursday, 5 January 1978:



35mm? 16mm?
Which edition?
Distributor?


The second Eastman House/Dryden showing that I can find of Pandora’s Box was Friday, 15 December 1978. It was immediately preceded by the below article:










Thomas Gladysz did a little bit of newspaper digging, and that inspired me to do the same.


WNET/13 in Manhattan licensed “PBS Movie Theater” but chopped off the series opening and instead rolled the movies into its own established series, “Cinema 13.” The WNET signal covered not only New York City but also much of New Jersey and Connecticut and at least as far up north as Poughkeepsie and at least as far down south as Philadelphia.









Channel 8 is where Channel 13 landed on the cable box.



WSIU/8 in Carbondale, Illinois, and its satellite WUSI/16 in Olney, Illinois.



WSIU/8, Carbondale.



WSIU/8, Carbondale.



WGBH/2, Boston.
The signal reached New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut,
and probably other places, too.



Repeat. “Cinema 13,” WNET/13, New York City.



Repeat. “Cinema 13,” WNET/13, New York City.



WETA/26, Washington, DC.
We see that the “PBS Movie Theater” opening was expunged and replaced with “Cinema 26.”




Enough already. I’m tired of all these capturoos. Here follows a simple list of the broadcasts I was able to trace down. Because TV listings insist that midnight ends the day rather than begins it, I have indicated this as 24:00 rather than 00:00.


DATE TIME STATION CITY SERIES
Fri 20 May 1977 24:00 WNET/13 Manhattan NY Cinema 13
 
Thu 09 Jun 1977 21:00 WSIU/8 Carbondale IL ?
Thu 09 Jun 1977 21:00 WUSI/16 Olney IL ?
 
Mon 13 Jun 1977 23:00 WGBH/2 Boston MA ?
 
Mon 18 Jul 1977 14:00 WNET/13 Manhattan NY Cinema 13
Mon 18 Jul 1977 14:00 WETA/26 Washington DC Cinema 26
 
Wed 21 Sep 1977 23:00 KLRN/9 Austin & San António TX PBS Movie Theater
 
Sat 22 Oct 1977 21:00 WGBY/12 Springfield MA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 22 Oct 1977 21:00 WGBY/57 Springfield MA PBS Movie Theater
 
Wed 16 Nov 1977 14:00 WETA/26 Washington DC Cinema 26
 
Sat 24 Dec 1977 21:00 KFME/13 Fargo ND ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 KISU/10 Pocatello ID ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 21:00 KLRN/9 Austin & San António TX PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 KNME/5 Albuquerque NM PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 KQEH/54 San José CA ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 23:00 KSPS/7 Spokane WA ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 24:00 KTCA/2 Minneapolis MN PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 KUED/7 Salt Lake UT PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 KVIE/6 Sacramento & Stockton CA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 KVIE/12 Sacramento & Stockton CA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 KYW/3 Philadelphia PA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WABW/14 Pelham GA ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WBRA/15 Roanoke VA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WCBB/10 Augusta ME ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WCES/20 Wrens GA ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WCML/6 Alpena MI PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WEDH/24 Hartford CT PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WEDU/3 Tampa FL PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WEDW/49 Stamford CT ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WENH/11 Durham NH PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WFYI/20 Indianapolis IN PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WGTV/8 Athens GA ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WHYY/12 Wilmington DE PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WJSP/8 Columbus GA ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WKPC/15 Louisville KY PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WKPO/15 Knoxville TN ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 21:00 WLPB/27 Baton Rouge LA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WMFE/24 Orlando FL ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 21:00 WNIN/9 Evansville IN ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WNJS/23 Camden NJ PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WQEX/16 Pittsburgh PA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WQLN/54 Erie PA ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 21:00 WSRE/23 Pensacola FL PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WTIU/30 Bloomington IN ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WUFT/5 Gainesville FL ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WVAN/9 Pembroke GA ?
Sat 24 Dec 1977 22:00 WVPT/51 Harrisonburg VA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 24 Dec 1977 21:00 WYES/12 New Orleans LA PBS Movie Theater
 
Sun 25 Dec 1977 20:00 KQEC/32 San Francisco CA ?
Sun 25 Dec 1977 21:00 WGBX/44 Boston MA ?
Sun 25 Dec 1977 12:30 WHYY/12 Wilmington DE PBS Movie Theater
 
Mon 26 Dec 1977 22:30 WSIU/8 Carbondale IL ?
Mon 26 Dec 1977 22:30 WUSI/16 Olney IL ?
 
Tue 27 Dec 1977 20:00 WLIW/21 Garden City NY ?
Tue 27 Dec 1977 23:30 WVIA/44 Scranton PA PBS Movie Theater
 
Wed 28 Dec 1977 21:30 KVDO/3 Salem OR ?
Wed 28 Dec 1977 13:30 KVIE/6 Sacramento & Stockton CA PBS Movie Theater
 
Sat 31 Dec 1977 23:30 KERA/13 Dallas TX ?
Sat 31 Dec 1977 14:00 KTCA/2 Minneapolis MN PBS Movie Theater
Sat 31 Dec 1977 22:00 KUHT/8 Houston TX PBS Movie Theater
Sat 31 Dec 1977 22:00 KVPT/18 Fresno CA PBS Movie Theater
Sat 31 Dec 1977 23:30 WGTV/8 Athens GA The Foreign Film II
Sat 31 Dec 1977 23:30 WPBT/2 Miami FL ?
Sat 31 Dec 1977 14:00 WPTD/16 Dayton OH PBS Movie Theater
 
Sun 01 Jan 1978 15:00 WNED/17 Buffalo NY PBS Movie Theater
 
Fri 06 Jan 1978 20:00 KHET/4 Hilo HI PBS Movie Theater
Fri 06 Jan 1978 20:00 KHET/11 Honolulu HI PBS Movie Theater
Fri 06 Jan 1978 20:00 KMEB/10 Wailuku HI PBS Movie Theater
 
Sat 07 Jan 1978 24:00 KAET/8 Phoenix AZ ?
 
Sun 08 Jan 1978 13:00 KCET/28 Los Ángeles CA ?
 
Mon 09 Jan 1978 24:00 KAET/8 Phoenix AZ ?
 
Sun 05 Feb 1978 15:00 WNED/17 Buffalo NY PBS Movie Theater
 
Fri 05 May 1978 14:00 WETA/26 Washington DC Cinema 26
 
Sat 24 Jun 1978 19:00 WILL/12 Urbana IL ?
 
Sun 10 Sep 1978 13:00 KLTM/13 Monroe LA Silver Screen
Sun 10 Sep 1978 22:00 KLTM/13 Monroe LA Silver Screen
Sun 10 Sep 1978 22:00 KLTS/24 Shreveport LA Silver Screen
Sun 10 Sep 1978 13:00 WLPB/27 Baton Rouge LA ?
Sun 10 Sep 1978 22:00 WLPB/27 Baton Rouge LA ?
 
Tue 26 Sep 1978 13:30 KPBS/15 San Diego CA ?
 
Mon 09 Oct 1978 22:30 WLEF/36 Park Falls WI ?
 
Sat 14 Oct 1978 22:30 WLEF/36 Park Falls WI ?
 
Mon 11 Dec 1978 24:00 WNPI/18 Norwood NY ?
 
Wed 09 May 1979 23:30 WNPI/18 Norwood NY ?
 
Sat 02 Jun 1979 10:00 WXXI/21 Rochester NY ?
 
Thu 14 Jun 1979 21:00 WITF/33 Harrisburg PA ?
 
Sat 16 Jun 1979 23:30 WNET/13 Manhattan NY Cinema 13
 
Wed 08 Aug 1979 13:00 WNED/17 Buffalo NY PBS Movie Theater
Wed 08 Aug 1979 13:00 WXXI/21 Rochester NY ?
 
Fri 10 Aug 1979 13:00 WCFE/57 Plattsburgh NY ?
Fri 10 Aug 1979 13:00 WCNY/24 Syracuse NY ?
Fri 10 Aug 1979 13:00 WLIW/21 Garden City NY ?
Fri 10 Aug 1979 13:00 WNED/17 Buffalo NY PBS Movie Theater
Fri 10 Aug 1979 13:00 WSKG/46 Binghamton NY ?
Fri 10 Aug 1979 13:00 WXXI/21 Rochester NY ?
 
Sat 11 Aug 1979 23:00 WCNY/24 Syracuse NY ?
 
Fri 17 Aug 1979 24:00 KCET/28 Los Ángeles CA ?
 
Sat 25 Aug 1979 23:00 WCNY/24 Syracuse NY ?


And that was the end of “PBS Movie Theater.” I miss it terribly.


I’m just barely beginning to understand how “PBS Movie Theater” worked. PBS headquarters shot out an entire season’s worth of movies at a single go, and member stations who had paid the license fees captured those satellite transmissions onto 2" quad. It must have been in late December 1976 that PBS shot out Pandora’s Box, and that was the one and only time it did so. Member stations could keep those quads and play them whenever they liked, but not past August 1979. Member stations were free to chop off the “PBS Movie Theater” intro/logo and substitute something of their own. Member stations were free to work these movies into different series. PBS licensed 102 movies, but 9 of those required extra fees, individually, which many PBS stations did not want to bother with. So most PBS stations got only 93 movies, though a few licensed one or two extras. PBS sent out a recommended schedule and a list of nine recommended repeats for those stations that did not wish to license the premium episodes. Member stations, though, were free to mix up the order as much as their little hearts desired. Some stations followed the PBS recommendations. Some let all the tapes sit in a corner and collect dust, but then aired them all in one big swell foop in July and August 1979. Come the first of September 1979, the quad tapes had to be wiped or returned or destroyed. How I wish at least one copy of each had been archived! Oh well.


In 1978 and then much more so in 1979, Pandora’s Box started popping up at more than just the occasional museum. It gained some popularity. Showings were greeted with display ads in the newspapers. Louise was still alive. She surely knew about this. She must have found it extremely odd.






#30#

Original research and commentary copyright © 2023 by Ranjit Sandhu.
All rights reserved.
The remainder of the research and all the images belong to others.
If any of these images are yours, please contact me and we’ll make things right.