Click to return to the first page


Click to return to previous page

The Famous “Deleted” Scene

THE ACCEPTED WISDOM is that the preview version was much longer, three full reels (about 30 minutes) longer. Total crock. To “prove” this point, a few scholars have pointed out some of the following seventeen unit stills.

We have here a unit still of what was probably Buster’s first attempt at creating a middle of the story. Buster shot most of the chase scenes first, and only afterwards did he try to figure out how to link them together. First he tried a complicated scene. He began by having Johnnie discover a black overcoat and top hat in the cab of the Texas. Johnnie uses them to disguise himself as a Northerner.

He walks into town and heads in the general direction of a tobacco shop. This town was later used as Marietta, but it is here being used as a Northern-held town just outside of Chattanooga.





He is visibly nervous when confronted with a Union soldier.

He goes entirely poker-faced when others arrive to say Hi.

Everywhere he turns, a Union soldier wants to make friends with him.


K27-195
There is enough cash in the overcoat pocket to allow him to enter a restaurant.


K27-157? [NOT SURE, ILLEGIBLE] (Margaret Herrick Library still # 55)
Johnnie finds himself joined at table by the great Snitz Edwards. The waitress is terribly suspicious of the stranger in town, because, after all, who on earth would dress in a black overcoat and top hat just to get a casual lunch? According to Kate Lewis, the waitress was Gene (Woodworth) Barnes (or perhaps Jean Woodward?, or perhaps Gene Woodword Barnes?). All right. Wait a minute. I’m looking at Kevin Brownlow’s book again. She was a chorus girl from NYC who went on location to learn about filmmaking. Her name was Gene Woodward and she told Kevin that this particular shot was just a test, nothing more. She never appeared before the movie cameras on this or any other Buster film. That’s a bit surprising, since this image fits the rest of the scene so well, but if she said it was just a test, then maybe it was just a test. Odd that such a test would be used as publicity for the film. Was she perhaps hired partly to serve as Marion Mack’s stunt double? If so, her services were never required; Marion did all her own stunts, willingly or otherwise. It was on location that 16-year-old Gene met Harry Barnes, and ten years later she married him. Look at that bartop in the background and the products on display behind it. Doesn’t that look remarkably like the behind-the-scenes shot above showing Roscoe Arbuckle as the bartender? Interiors were built on the Keaton lot at 1025 Lillian Way in Hollywood, but this one interior, filmed while Buster was inventing the story on the spot, on camera, was certainly filmed in Oregon.


K27-153 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 111)
Captain Anderson, probably clued in by the first soldier and maybe by the waitress, rushes in to seize Johnnie.


K27-163

K27-166L (Margaret Herrick Library still # 57)
Johnnie somehow evades capture and hides on the wooden overhang. In the final film, the Union rendezvous looks quite like this building, as it was built on the same plan. Actually, it was probably a different section of the same building. Why is the negative number K27-166L rather than K27-166? My guess is that the L indicated that the still would be used on a lobby card.


K27-166L (Margaret Herrick Library still # 57)

Buster didn’t like this scene and perhaps he never completed it and never printed the takes. He tried again, this time more simply, just with Snitz Edwards:


K27-165 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 122)
In the still above, we see that Johnnie has entered a Northern-held village just outside of Chattanooga, still wearing his give-away engineer’s outfit. He is hunted by a single Northerner, portrayed by Snitz Edwards, who has noticed that he is hiding atop the overhang. This scene was not working. Buster abandoned this attempt, sent Snitz home, and tried something new.


K27-180 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 67)


K27-181
Note that this is the costume he would wear later in the shooting, when he would film his visit to Annabelle’s house. He gave this up and tried a different approach.


K27-179 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 69)
Some local detectives, brothers, wearing laughably obvious fake moustaches, get the idea that something is up. Johnnie, recognizing that he is under suspicion, goes poker-faced. (One of those two brothers, by the way, would soon appear as an extra in College.)


K27-184
Fight, flight, freeze? Freeze. Not only is Johnnie as immobile as a marble statue, so are his pursuers.

He then gave this up and tried again, without the black vest.


Brother Number Two in the opening of College.
Can anybody identify him?

K27-189
Johnnie wonders if his drink is spiked.



The above seventeen unit stills are from four different sequences that Buster clearly abandoned. Each was a failed attempt at creating a middle for the story. It is obvious, more than obvious, why Buster junked this footage. It didn’t have the singular drive of the rest of the story. He did not want the story to wander, to shift gears. He wanted a concentrated, focused, single line of narrative, without any meandering. After he filmed four different middles of the story, he got a brainwave. He soon realized that it would be better, tighter, neater if the refuge he sought happened to be the Union rendezvous. So, that is what he did instead. At last, he knew how to film the middle of the story, and once he had figured that out, he filmed it on location, in the restaurant/PO/general store/recruiting office. He followed that up with Johnnie and Annabelle helping dress General Vroom in battle gear and mount him on his horse, and he also filmed the arrest of General Thatcher, since both took place on the exterior of that set. Despite what the written evidence suggests, he did not film the Union rendezvous upon his return to his 1025 Lillian Way studio in Hollywood. As for the above four different restaurant sequences, they were NEVER included in the film, not even in the early test screenings. They were likely never even completed.

Now that he decided to junk all four of these attempts, he was free to recycle Main Street as downtown Marietta. He now junked his original introduction, underneath the locomotive, riding with Annabelle on a bicycle built for two, having a photographer take a portrait of him and his ladyfriend. All that was now gone. He reshot the opening scenes in an entirely different way, much simpler, much more direct.

Looks like the same set to me! This set was certainly built in or near Cottage Grove, not in Hollywood, and it was fully functional. A different portion of this interior, or more likely a similar structure but roofless, was used at the beginning for the General Store/Post Office/Recruiting Station.

Back in the 1990’s, I decorated my office with reproductions of several of these stills, but I had no idea how they were to have fit into The General. I enjoyed gazing at them and wondering, hoping someday to learn more. I would soon meet Tracey (Doyle) Goessel, who was also puzzling over this. Tracey published an article about a bunch of these stills, and she came up with some theories. They were really clever theories, but they didn’t explain everything and they didn’t quite fit together. “That Stoevpipe Hat: The Story of The General’s Abandoned Sequence,” The Great Stone Face, 1996, pp. 17–23. I read her article several times in quite some excitement, and that is when I began to get headaches. I began to puzzle over these stills, too, for weeks and weeks and weeks. What I scribbled onto this web page is the best I can do at the moment. If I can ever find more source materials, I’ll have better explanations.

Once Buster dumped this latest attempt at a middle, there was no further reason to introduce the black overcoat and top hat, and yet they are still introduced. Why did Buster not reshoot the extremely brief locomotive scene in which he discovered that costume? It’s not as though he had lost access to the trains or to the location by that time. As a matter of fact, he was still in Cottage Grove and still had more scenes of the trains to film. Very puzzling indeed! Instead of reshooting that scene, he invented a new scene in which he ditches the costume. Very, very puzzling, indeed! Unexpectedly, the scene in which he ditches the costume was shot not on location, but on a forest set at the 1025 Lillian Way backlot in Hollywood. I strongly suspect that Buster did indeed shoot an equivalent scene on location, but that he decided to do it again when he returned to Hollywood.


Spooked, Johnnie will momentarily ditch the overcoat and top hat.
This was shot at the 1025 Lillian Way studio.

Why didn’t he reshoot the engine scene to omit the discovery of the overcoat and top hat? I’m thinking about that. A lot. I begin to think that he planned to, but then thought better of it. I bet he liked that little nonsequitur; it added just a touch of flavor, a hint of someone else’s life. I betcha.

Begin to think? I’m still thinking. One of the aspects of the movie that most captivated me from the time I first saw it concerns all the characters in the background who are just going about their lives. There are countless extras in the movie, as there need to be. Most are not individuated; they are just specks in larger crowds. When we first see Kingston station, there was no need for us to see anything more than Kingston station. Nonetheless, Buster showed us a bit more. He showed us that the train there had just arrived and that passengers in the distance were alighting:



For most people, life just goes on. There was no narrative need to show this. If someone from production or accounting had been on location that day, there would surely have been arguments. Buster was right to show this, though. The activity in the background barely registers, but it does register, at least subconsciously. (This shot is severely undercranked, by the way, in order to make it appear that the stolen General is racing.)



Johnnie needs some form of transportation. By the strict needs of narrative, he could have grabbed a stray high wheel rather easily. That was not good enough. We should see that the high wheel (or penny farthing) has its own story. It is pedaled by an elderly gentleman, even though the high wheel was a youthful hobby. Clearly, this is not your ordinary everyday elderly gentleman! He is someone special, but we see him only for the briefest moment. It hardly matters that the high wheel was not invented until 1871. It matters even less that this model of the high wheel was entirely apocryphal, invented only for this movie.



This really caught my attention during that first viewing lo those decades ago. Johnnie is clearing the track and chasing a platoon of thieves, but a person in a yard pays hardly any attention. Now, in 16mm, 8mm, VHS, laserdisc, and even DVD, it is impossible to tell if this is a man or a woman. Even in the 35mm Jay Ward print from 1970 and in the 35mm Rohauer print from 1979, it was impossible to tell. On the Kino Blu-ray K669 from 2009, we can see that this is a woman, and I was stunned to notice a baby with her. The baby had never been at all visible before. Facial features? Not even the Blu-ray helps. Just saw a beautiful DCP on the big screen, and the DCP must have been scanned directly from the camera negative, with tons of surgery to clean up blemishes and scratches and dirt, and I could finally see just barely enough to determine that both mommy and baby are black. They apparently live in a tumble-down shack and are wearing clothes that are hardly better than rags. My best guess? That was the real family that really lived there. When mommy and baby appeared in the yard, Buster must have told them, “Stay right there. Don’t do anything. Thanks.” I would love to learn about them. Any clues? Anybody?



There was no need at all to show the servant washing the dishes, snuffing the candle, angry about being compelled to sleep on a wooden floor rather than in a bed. There was no need to invent such a character. Yet he adds flavor. He makes the rest of the story more human.

So that is why Buster left in the black overcoat and the top hat. They lend the Texas a story, a human story. The engineer of the Texas, whom we never meet, has a black overcoat and a top hat, an outfit meant only for the most formal occasions, such as attending an opera, and we do not usually think of train engineers when we think of opera. Actually, to us, the overcoat and top hat seem more to belong to a villain in a melodrama. That’s a little hint of a story, someone else’s story, someone we never see and about whom we learn nothing more. The rest of the world continues, properly oblivious to our own little stories. Life goes on.

Now, as I pound the keyboard in my attempts to make sense of this minimal data, I am thinking. The first shots were, necessarily, of the over-and-under trestle at Black Rock just outside of Dallas, Oregon. Once that was shot, the locomotives could be transported to Cottage Grove. I am pretty much convinced that, once Buster was in Cottage Grove with the locomotives, he decided to use the Marietta structures as the Northern-held village instead, but before he began to shoot on that set, he changed his mind and made that outdoor set serve as Main Street in Marietta. He shot the introduction and then he shot the chase north and the chase south simultaneously. When the National Guard came in for six days, he shot the battle scenes. After he finished the buik of the shooting, he tried to work out ways to connect the chase north with the chase south. Above, we see probably four failed attempts to create a middle of the story. What appears in the final film is the fifth attempt. The middle of the final film has long puzzled me, because it was conceived in fits and starts, and because, contrary to what one would expect, the interior (Union rendezvous) was shot on location while the exteriors (the woods outside the Union rendezvous) were shot on the 1025 Lillian Way back lot. Shall we do some examinatin’?

Note how similar the windows and curtains are. The exterior on the left and the interior on the right are from the same plans. These two images were shot in Oregon.


The dining room is on the left, and the bedroom is on the right.
They are the same room!


The beginning on the left, and a moment later on the right.
After Buster shot this as continuous action, he got an idea to interrupt it with an insert:


This insert was filmed later, possibly on a different day.


Back-lot studio set on the left, decorated to match Oregon.
On the right, a still image of a sky with animated lightning painted over it.


Left: Studio with a trained bear. Indoor or outdoor set? Right: 1025 Lillian Way. Outdoor set.


Left and Right: 1025 Lillian Way. Outdoor set.

What happened? I bet that Buster and Marion performed the sequence on location, and I bet it was really simple: Just a dash to a safe spot in the woods. After the crew completed the location shooting, Buster and Marion performed their scenes again, with great elaboration, at the studio at 1025 Lillian Way. I betcha.

There is more.



On the left is one exterior wall of one building of the original Northern village set, shot in Oregon. On the right is the scene in which Johnnie conks out a Northern sentry, which may have been shot in Oregon or it may have been shot at 1025 Lillian Way. I can’t tell. That’s not all.



On the left is an exterior shot of the Northern-held village, a village on the outskirts of Chattanooga. On the right is the same village, somewhat modified, this time functioning as Marietta. It gets better:



Different sections of the same building (restaurant?), on the left in a Northern-held village, on the right as it appears in the final film, as the new Division Headquarters in Marietta.

Would you like some more interesting images? I sure want some more interesting images. Well, we have a Portland newspaper to thank. It shows us some extras, who, if they are visible in the final film, they are so far in the distance that they are unrecognizable, and that is a terrible pity. Does anybody out there know their stories? Especially Joseph Anderson Wisdom of Portland. Born on 8 April 1848. He apparently had a slave narrative, and I simply MUST find it somehow. After the war, he moved to Minnesota and became a railroad porter. In 1914 he helped to incorporate the Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church. In Oregon, he was drum major of the band at the New Northwest Lodge No. 2554, Grand United Order of Odd Fellows. He became a conductor on the Columbia River Railroad, which was later gobbled up by the Oregon Railway and Navigation Company. Later he became a janitor at the Post Office, and when I worked in the Post Office, the janitors were about the only coworkers whose company I enjoyed. Later he was a janitor in the Federal Building Custom House. Then he went back to the ORNC. He died on 29 November 1937. There must be lots of rich stories, and I wish I could learn them.



Isn’t that rich? Note the photo at the top right, showing the main street in Marietta. In the film, we see the building in the foreground on the right, but in this photograph we see the top of the building, upon which is written THEATRE. The theatre, of course, was gone a year later, replaced by the C.S. Christian Commission.

Before we proceed, first let me pick your brains. Those stills with the two brothers, you know, like this one:


K27-184

And that frame grab from College, you know, this one:



Yeah, that guy. Is he the same as this guy?



And is he the same as this guy?



I can’t tell. I really, really can’t tell. What say you? Is the restaurant guy also the Confederate commander?




The Mystery Stills

Unit stills are a bloody nuisance. They are shot with 8×10 view cameras, and when the developed negatives come back from the lab the next day, they are not in any order. The publicists mark numbers on the negatives, but they make no effort to number them in the sequence that they were shot. A lower number is closer to the beginning of the production and the highest numbers are closer to the ending of the production, but refining the sequence more closely than that is pretty much impossible. When these unit stills are printed in booklets and newspapers and magazines and books and programs and brochures, the graphics staff usually make sure to crop them in order to cut off the negative numbers. They do that deliberately just to frustrate my research and make me shout incoherently out the window. Since unit stills often correspond to nothing in the final film, there is no record of what they were about. Mixed in, of course, are the occasional gag photos and portraits and location tests that had never been part of the movie. Nonetheless, we can figure a few things out.

INTRODUCTION, ATTEMPT # 1. Here we have the first attempt at shooting the first scene.


K27-7
Here we have an entirely different conception from anything that appears in the final film. Johnnie is dressed in an upper-class fashion, rather than working class. The faces of the townsfolk and the slaves are visible. Buster’s original idea was to present an impression of daily life in Marietta. Below we zoom in to take a closer look:



Then we get the irony. Upper-class Johnnie turns out actually to be a working-class locomotive engineer.

Just discovered this still on John Bengtson’s site. Note that Johnnie is wearing a cap and a tie, and that he has nothing in his hands.

Johnnie has a rag in his right hand. Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie.

The rag is gone. Instead, Johnnie has an oil can in his right hand. Is this a different part of the scene? Or is this a different attempt at the scene? Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie.

Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie.


K27-6 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 2)
Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie.

Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie.

Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie.


K27-14
Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie.

This wasn’t too exciting, and so Buster junked the sequence.

INTRODUCTION, ATTEMPT # 2. Buster now tried something different.

Note that Johnnie is wearing a cap but no tie. Why? As a cue to his editors who were hammering together the preliminary assembly. “If you see a tie, toss it out; it’s old. Just use the stuff without a tie.” The cutters who spliced together the preliminary assembly were, as far as we can tell, J. Sherman Kell assisted by Harry Barnes.




K27-9
Note that he is wearing a cap but no tie.

This sequence is in the final film, but a different take from a different angle. Note that he is wearing a cap but no tie.

This wasn’t too exciting, and so Buster junked the sequence.

INTRODUCTION, ATTEMPT # 3. Buster now tried something different, yet again.


K27-31-
Routine maintenance. Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie. “All that stuff we did two days ago with the tie, you tossed it out, right? Good. Okay, if there’s no tie, toss it out; it’s old. Just use the stuff with a tie.”

Jackie Lowe is curious about the engineer. Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie.


K27-15 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 107)
Johnnie now has two young fans, Jackie Lowe and Jackie Hanlon. Note that Johnnie is wearing a cap and a tie.


K27-1 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 114)
Note that he is wearing a cap and a tie. This would do for now. Buster now went on to shoot other scenes.

INTRODUCTION, ATTEMPT # 4. After shooting the chase scenes, Buster had new ideas about the opening, and so he tried it again.

At the end of location shooting, Buster decided he didn’t like his introduction, and so he reshot it. Note that he is wearing a tie but no cap. This demonstrates that he was shooting a revised sequence. Why is the cap gone? So that he could tell the cutter who was splicing together the preliminary assembly: “If you see a cap, junk it; it’s old. Just use the stuff without a cap.”

INTRODUCTION, ATTEMPT # 5. Still not satisfied. Buster tried again.


K27-198 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 75)
Buster starts over again, but not right away. After the bulk of filming was completed, he decided that he did not like the opening. He called back the two young boys who now offer to become Johnnie’s lackeys. They pump some water into a pan so that Johnnie can wash his face. Note that he is not wearing a cap or a tie. “If you see a cap and tie, toss it; it’s old. Just use the stuff without a cap and tie.”


K27-231
Johnnie’s face is lathered with soap, a harbinger of things to come. Note that he is not wearing a cap or a tie. Why did Buster delete this whole sequence? Because it was mere padding.

Once he tossed his first five attempts at creating an opening to the picture, Buster landed on ATTEMPT # 6, which is what we have in the film. It is much simpler, much more direct, much quicker, without any meandering.

Here is an unauthorized VCD issued in 1994, illicitly copied from the Atlas Film VHS of that same year. The disc contains an image I have not seen elsewhere. It appears that it was intended to be at the beginning of the film. We see Johnnie struggling to lift some sort of something, probably to stuff it into a boxcar. Might you know where this image was originally published? Do you have a copy? Do you know where I could purchase a copy? Please let me know. Thanks!

Archery. Was this between-the-scenes recreation? Or was it originally a scene in the movie? I have gone back and forth on this. As of today, I suspect this was truly a scene in the movie.


(Margaret Herrick Library still # 73)
Right towards the end of location work, after shooting the chases, Buster decided to shoot (reshoot?) Johnnie’s courtship of Annabelle. We first learn that Johnnie and Annabelle are an item when they hire a photographer to take their picture. Buster cut this out. Too complicated. He found a much simpler way to introduce her character. Nonetheless, his publicists retained this image for one of the half-sheet posters. Note that Johnnie here wears the costume he had worn in the third version of the abandoned restaurant scene.

Zo, what do we know so far about the beginning of the story? Originally, there were lots of scenes of Johnnie operating his locomotive, exploring it, maintaining it, oiling it, cleaning it. As he was caring for his precious machine, two small boys approach him and offer to become his lackeys. Once Johnnie’s character is established, then we would learn about Marietta. We would see Ned Binford and J.A. Wisdom, among other people, portraying slaves. Perhaps we would see Johnnie relaxing by means of archery. Then we learn that he is engaged to Annabelle. A photographer with a glass-plate view camera takes a portrait of the two of them on the porch. We learn from Marion Mack about another scene. Gregg Rickman, “Marion Mack 30 Years Later,” Cobblestone: The Magazine of All the Arts vol. 3 no. 27, Summer 1977, p. 24:

I remember one song he used to sing was that song “Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do.” He used to sing that a lot. And when we had — it was cut out of the film I think — we had a ride on a bicycle built for two, Buster and I. I sat on one seat and Buster on the other, and he was singing that the whole time on the bicycle.

Then, after Buster spent probably several days creating and shooting all this material, what did he do? He tossed it all away. It was all waste. After Buster shot all this material, he realized he could tell the story in a much simpler way. So, to my everlasting regret, we never get to see Johnnie’s care of his locomotive, we never get to see the budding rapport between Johnnie and the two young tykes, we never get to see the slave folk up close with details of their daily lives, we never get to see Ned Binford and J.A. Wisdom, we never get to see Johnnie singing “Daisy” as he pedals with Annabelle on the bicycle built for two, we never get to see the portrait photographer at work with his view camera. Any writer would recognize this situation. When we sit down to scribble a massive tome, we discover after 70 or 80 pages that we could express all the ideas more clearly, more succinctly, more memorably in a single paragraph. Buster had by now shot probably several hours of film to establish the characters, the locale, the milieu, and then realized that it did not advance the narrative. He lost a great deal in texture and atmosphere, but he gained a great deal in economy of storytelling. So he junked cans and cans of exposed film. The executives at United Artists must have been seething. A standard studio director would do one or two takes and be done with it. Buster was not satisfied until everything was just right, and he was not afraid to toss days and days of work into the rubbish bin once he could work out a better way to tell his story. What Buster and you and I recognize as professionalism, that is what studio executives recognize only as incompetence and waste. Once the execs at United Artists saw the bills and receipts, they were done with Buster. There is no documentation anywhere to indicate that this was the situation, but there is no other way to interpret what happened afterwards.

In the final film, Johnnie, with some embarrassment, hands Annabelle a gift, and we see that it is a photograph:

Tracey Goessel noticed something fascinating. This was shot in Hollywood, after the bulk of location work had been completed. The above photo is a composite of unit stills of two rejected scenes. One of those rejected images was from an abandoned first attempt at an introduction:


K27-4

The other was from the abandoned third attempt at the restaurant scene:


K27-181

This is surprising. This is a reprise of a gag that Buster had used at the beginning of The Goat. It stretches credulity too much, and so he rethought this scene entirely and did a much nicer job of it.



K27-33, or G-7 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 6)
What does the G stand for?
My guess is Glossy, indicating a photo that would be included in a press pack.
This, I guess, was a second attempt.
Compare the above with the actual movie:

The men in queue behind Johnnie here are not all the same as the men in queue behind Johnnie once they are inside the building. This must have been shot on different days when different extras were available.


K27-186
I was surprised to discover this image on the back of the IVC Classic Film Collection IVCV-3214S VHS from Japan. This reveals that Buster tried this scene a few different ways before settling upon a simpler rendition. That’s Frank Hagney, by the way, as the recruiter. The guy in queue behind Johnnie? I wish I knew.
Buster shot this scene fairly early on in the production, but then, after he filmed the bulk of the chase scenes, he shot the recruitment scene again. At several moments during the chases, we see Johnnie lose his temper but quickly catch himself. Now Buster decided to use Johnnie’s bursts of anger to help the story along. For the retake of the recruitment scene, Buster shows us that Johnnie is hair-triggered and unpleasantly argumentative. That is why General Vroom and Recruiter Hagney don’t find it worth their while to explain anything to him, but just unceremoniously kick him out of the building, quite physically.


K27-34 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 7)
You’ve seen this unit still, yes? It was included in Buster’s as-told-to memoir, My Wonderful World of Slapstick. And you couldn’t figure out how on earth it fitted into the story, could you? Well, you weren’t paying attention. I wasn’t paying attention, either. Note Budd Fine on the right, the one wearing a hat and holding a supply bag (filled with fake Confederate uniforms). He later becomes a sniper, right near the end of the story. I looked at this still for the seven hundred and eighty-third time, and then it occurred to me: Budd carries a supply bag early in the movie, in his first scene. The still above is the theft of the General! Johnnie is descending from the cab only to be surprised by two strangers. One can understand why Buster didn’t like the idea of Johnnie being overpowered. He preferred that Johnnie be tricked. (Note that this is a duplicate made on a copy stand. The edges, especially the bottom right, are overexposed because the twin lamps on the stand were a bit misfocused, a problem that is pretty much impossible to detect until the duplicate is processed. I have never seen a copy of this photo without that problem. Even the one in Buster’s memoir is from this same duplicate. Does anybody have an original?)


K27-28 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 5)
The two strangers have now got Johnnie where they want him, and they commandeer the engine. Budd, by the way, had just appeared in Battling Butler. The tall raider on the left is Jack Dempster.

Jack A. Dempster, by the way, is a mystery. We know he was born in Chicago in 1901, but the exact date is unknown and his parents and relatives are unknown, though we do know that his parents were from Norway. We know that he completed the sixth grade and then left school. We know he went to Nebraska and enlisted at age 13, but was kicked out at age 15 when the military learned his true age. We know he enlisted in the Navy at 17 and shipped from Portland to China and Japan and other oriental countries. We know that he was discharged in 1921 in San Pedro as a Machinist Mate First Class. We know he married at age 18 and was soon divorced. We know he was on camera in the “Winnie Winkle” shorts as well as in Tramp, Tramp, Tramp, The Cave Man, Battling Butler, The Iron Horse, and Don Juan. If he appeared in Battling Butler or Tramp, Tramp, Tramp, then he definitely ended up on the cutting-room floor. Need to watch the others to see if I can recognize his face buried in a distant crowd scene. We know that in 1928 he listed himself as a machinist, party affiliation Republican, residing at 317 West 3rd Street in Los Ángeles. We know that in 1930 his address was 1119 Poinsettia Drive Apt 225, Beverly Hills, and that he worked in movies as a “screen maker,” and I have no idea what that means. We know that in 1932 he resided at 3331 Maceo Street in Los Ángeles and moved to or moved from 1016 N New Hampshire Avenue in Los Ángeles. We know that in 1936 he listed himself as an actor residing at 5545 Virginia Avenue in Los Ángeles, though in the voter rolls he listed himself as a driver residing at 5423 Virginia Avenue. From 1934 through 1936 there was a Jack C. Dempster who I suspect was our very own Jack A. Dempster but with a typo, residing at 755 Cambridge Avenue in San Mateo and working as a chauffeur. We know that by 1940 he had moved to San António but came back to Los Ángeles, renting a flat at 5822 Holmes Avenue at one time and at 3022 Farmdale Avenue at another, and that he was by then working as a truck driver, earning $900/year. In 1942 he worked as a millwright residing at 3022 Farmdale Avenue in Los Ángeles. And then he vanishes from the record. Who was his ex? When was his birthday? Did he have siblings? Who were his parents? When did he pass away? Was there an obituary? Does anybody know anything at all about him, personally? His onscreen presence in The General is fascinating and I find myself drawn to him. Would love to learn more, but the trail is so cold.

In the final film, the uprooted rail is not deposited here, but into the weeds on the other side of the track.


K27-G10 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 105)
It doesn’t work out quite like this in the final film. Here we see Johnnie rescue the handcar and plop it back onto the track. In the final film, we can see one of the Raiders stick rocks between the rail and the guardrail further to force a derailment where a rail is missing. Look carefully and you can see those rocks in this photo. Those rocks are what catapult the handcar down the slope into the stream, destroying it.

That negative number is curious, is it not? My uneducated wild guess is that this was pulled from the bulk of the stills and used in the press packs. The “G” probably indicates “Glossy,” and the “10” surely meant that it was the tenth still in the envelope. That leaves open the question of what it was numbered prior to being pulled for the press pack.

Johnnie clambers over a wooden snake-rail fence in search of some sort of transportation. Buster gave up on this sequence and put the snake-rail fence to a different purpose in a later sequence.

Interesting wood-frame bicycle. This is an apocryphal cross between a bone-shaker and a penny-farthing, neither of which had been invented by the time of the Civil War. Note also that this is an earlier take. Buster and his crew had not yet thought to show us the bicycle’s owner.


In an earlier conception, the bicycle ride was longer.


Is this a unit still of a different take? Or is this just a publicity still?


This is not the same as the similar scene in the film.
Below is the frame grab, showing a different locale,
a different posture, a different gag, really:




K27-206 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 80)
This mysterious unit still was surely part of the same sequence,
but how did it fit in?
Clearly this alternative version had a different gag.
It seems that this what survives in the film is the earlier version,
and that this is an attempted replacement that Buster ultimately rejected.
It surely tied in with the image below:


K27-214 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 84)
Isn’t this one odd? We can fully understand why Buster rejected this sequence. For The General, he did not want gags for the sake of gags. The gags needed to be plausible and they needed to advance the narrative. Even though we know nothing else about this moment, we can see that it was not plausible and did not advance the narrative.


K27-91


(Margaret Herrick Library still # 34)
This scene was trimmed. Here was see Johnnie survey his situation, wondering how on earth the other train got away from him without using rails. Buster cut this moment out and preferred just to get on with the story. If you watch the movie carefully, you can see where Johnnie is about to get out of his cab, but the action cuts off extremely quickly. Here, take a look:




K27-216
Sorry. I’m clueless. We can see that the track seems to be on a bridge, or on some sort of elevation, and there is a burning stick just off the track, along with some smoke from smoldering embers. Johnnie is emptying some of the tender’s water supply in the hopes of dowsing those smoldering embers. Really, though, I don’t see the point of this. We are missing the context. I hope that the unit stills taken immediately before and after are still extant somewhere.


K27-192 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 66)
This plays differently, and much better, in the final film.

The Columbia in the background. This scene was staged somewhat differently in the final film.


K27-97-L (Margaret Herrick Library still # 123)
There’s that L again.
Was this image ever used on a lobby card?
Yes, this is in the movie, but not exactly. The sack here is properly filled with supplies. Though it made the scene more convincing, it broke the continuity. Buster retook the scene as cartoonish parody, this time with Annabelle obviously inside. Tom Nawn is the officer.

There’s another one of those blasted renumberings. I do not know what the “L” means, nor do I know what the original negative number was.


K27-220 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 118)
Johnnie and Annabelle set a fire with wood in order to delay the Union raiders. The burning timber that Johnnie is carrying was taken from the snake-rail fence seen in some previous stills. This scene was tossed out to make way for a superior fire at the Rock River Bridge. Ah. We may have the solution to this mystery! See the below newspaper article. It seems that, originally, Johnnie would set the boxcar afire to replicate the damage done to him on the way north. On the return voyage, though, Annabelle gets trapped inside and Johnnie somehow rescues her. Ahhhhhh. I can see why Buster discarded this scene and recycled an element of it into the scene at the Rock River bridge. This might also explain a boxcar swap that we are not supposed to notice.




K27-211L or K27-211J6 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 82)
Hmmmm. Was the “L” really for “Lobby”? What is the “J6” for? The “J6” is cropped off of this scan, but I have seen it elsewhere. “211” was the original negative number.


K27-210
Behind the scenes, Buster, still in costume, surveys the damage. There was a gag photo taken at this time, showing Buster sticking his head out of the tender’s water hatch. Alas, I cannot find that photo right now.

Oh, wait, here it is. Well, not the whole photo. It’s vignetted for some reason:
Oh, wait, here it is, the whole image (courtesy of Bob Borgen):

K27-208
Note that U.S.M.R.R. has been scraped off and that W.&.A.R.R. has been painted over it. This was originally the Columbia, but at the last minute it was switched with the Texas, which necessitated the hasty paint-over, which is invisible in long-shot.

K27-126 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 43)
An earlier take, much slower than the final take. That curved sign, partly blocked by the tender: C.S. Christian Commission. Was there such a thing? There was a U.S. Christian Commission. Did the Confederates have a parallel organization, with the same name? Or is this just a very subtle joke? Does anybody know?


K27-141
Posted by Linda Bartos on Pinterest. Another abandoned bit, abandoned because it interrupted the narrative. Johnnie does not enter this location in the final film. We can determine from his costume that he has arrived back in his home town. So this must be on his way towards the battle, but he is not wearing his sword. This pacing was too slow and its action was too meandering. It is easy to understand why Buster rejected this scene and, surely, the scenes surrounding it. The action in the final film is smooth, simple, and fast.


K27-140
The above doesn’t look like what you remember, does it?
That’s because it isn’t.
Compare it with the same moment in the final movie, below:


K27-162 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 59)
An earlier version of the reward. Buster tossed this into the rubbish bin and replaced it with something a bit more memorable.


K27-174 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 61)
The recruiter is Frank Sidney Hagney (20 March 1884 – 25 June 1973).


K27-175 (Margaret Herrick Library still # 62)




What do we learn from the above? We learn that though Buster knew the story, he did not work it out fully ahead of time. It would have hampered him to do so. He needed to create freshly, as the cameras were rolling. Like Chaplin, he worked scenes out numerous different ways before he found the proper setup, the proper pacing, the proper irony, the proper drive. He shot each of his attempts at creating a scene. He was not afraid to make mistakes, even embarrassing ones. If the only idea he could come up with was a bad idea, he would film the bad idea, knowing that he would not get a good idea until he completed his bad idea. He was not worried sick about shooting ratios or shooting schedules. He did what he needed to do to get the scenes, the pace, the characters, the reactions just right. Sometimes he and his troupe got things perfect in a single take, yes, but I doubt that happened often. He shot more than enough material for The General to have assembled two almost entirely different movies — possibly three almost entirely different movies. Were he to have been under strict supervision, ordered to stick assiduously to the script and storyboard, his creativity would have been entirely crippled. And that is precisely what would happen a mere two years later.

What else do we learn? We learn about a unique way of creating a story, in which drafts are not scribbled onto yellow pads with Bic pens, nor are they keyboarded onto a computer. The stories are not created according to the rules of dactylic hexameter. This was a method of creating a story by hiring a large group of technicians to build structures and modify machines and design clothing and paint backdrops, and then to use Kodak negative as a scratch pad. Roscoe Arbuckle learned this method from working at the Keystone studio, and he was one of the few who mastered the technique. Charlie Chaplin picked up on it too, but he struggled mightily with the form, though his end results were, admittedly, usually quite nice. Both Roscoe and Charlie happened to be seasoned vaudeville/music-hall performers who had begun performing in childhood and knew no other life. Buster also was born to the variety stage and had been performing since infancy. He mastered this new story-creating technique better than Roscoe or Charlie, and he mastered it easily, as it came to him naturally. I know of no one else who was so much at ease with the form as he was. This was not a common skill, and Buster was gifted. After The General, he would never be permitted to create so freely again, and that restriction, that prohibition against doing what came most naturally, pained him more than he ever understood.

This leads me to a question: Why did Buster destroy the rejects? Well, admittedly, we do not know what he did with them. All we know for certain is that the rejects no longer exist. In all likelihood, though, he did indeed destroy the rejects, and he probably destroyed them immediately. If that is indeed what he did, then I can think of two possible reasons why. My first guess is that Buster saw no point in keeping a bunch of junk that could never be put to use. My second guess is that Buster did not want some producer or distributor rifling through his rejects and reinstating them. I wish that all his rejects had been preserved, but at least we have some unit stills of his rejects, which is quite good compensation.

The pressbook claims that Buster exposed over 200,000 feet of film (over 37 hours) in making The General. While it is not a good idea to take a pressbook’s claims at face value, this one claim I think is trustworthy, because this is the sort of information that a publicist would normally want to deny. You see, the final film was a mere 7,084 feet or thereabouts. 200,000 divided by 7,084 gives us a “shooting ratio” of greater than 28:1. Any other director would be fired for such a shooting ratio. Of course, Buster really made two movies, a domestic version and an export version; so, in the interest of fairness, we should revise that shooting ratio to somewhat greater than 14:1. Any other director would be fired for such a shooting ratio. To shoot 14 hours of film to get 1 usable hour is considered a sure sign of negligence and of the most outrageous incompetence. Yet Buster knew exactly what he was doing, and so did Clyde, and they would never have gotten their superlative quality had they shot more economically. By some miracle of the gods, Joe Schenck and the trustees of Buster Keaton Productions did not raise a stink. They knew that was how Buster and his crew operated, and they knew that the results were profitable. I wonder what the executives at United Artists thought, though. After all, though UA had not invested in the production of The General, its accountants nonetheless probably suffered fits of apoplexy when they saw the financial reports come in, especially the carbon copies of the bills from Kodak for raw stock. They probably confronted Schenck and the trustees and issued an ultimatum to reign Buster in. I bet they issued that ultimatum, and I bet that Schenck and the trustees had no alternative but to give in. There is no hard evidence of that anywhere, and no such claim has been made anywhere, but that is what the circumstantial evidence suggests. That, I am guessing, is why Buster was not permitted to direct his next two movies. In his stead, the money people hired other directors, journeymen directors who were considerably faster and far more economical and efficient. When Buster unofficially took over direction anyway, that is when the trustees sold off his production company and washed their hands of the whole affair. Since United Artists had made it clear that it wanted nothing more to do with Buster, Schenck and the trustees sold the company to MGM. Why MGM? My guess, and it is nothing more than a guess, is that it was not MGM that was interested, but only that Joe Schenck’s brother Nicholas agreed only as a favor, and he had charge of acquisitions. Remember, he had been a principal stockholder in Buster Keaton Productions. It would be most interesting to know the sale price of Keaton Productions, the profit, and the advantage to each of the trustees. That, though, I suppose, is a long-lost secret.